Legal Opinion

Flint v. Cook

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1885No. 11,902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

This suit was brought to recover the price of a wind-mill, which it is alleged was sold and delivered by Flint, Willing & Co., of Kendallville, Indiana, to James M. Cook. The contract of sale is in writing, and contained among other stipulations the following: “ If you accept this order and ship me the goods ordered above, it is with the distinct understanding, and is a part of this contract, that if the wind-mill does not work well for sixty days after erected, I am to notify you and give you ninety days after receipt of such notice by you in which to remedy the defect, and if you can not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Gibson v. CranageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Daggett & Graves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877
  5. McClamrock v. FlintIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shirk v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. May v. HooverIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Aultman, Miller & Co. v. SeichtingIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Ohio Thresher & Engine Co. v. HenselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API