Legal Opinion

In re Murray

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1990No. Nos. 89-523 and 89-525PublishedCited by 348 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution provides, inter alia, that courts of appeals “shall have such jurisdiction as may be provided by law to review and affirm, modify, or reverse judgments or final orders of the courts of record inferior to the court of appeals within the district * * *.”

R.C. 2501.02 provides, inter alia, as follows:

“In addition to the original jurisdiction conferred by Section 3 of Article IV, Ohio Constitution, the court shall have jurisdiction:
“Upon an appeal upon questions of law to review, affirm, modify, set aside, or reverse judgments or final orders of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by348 opinions

  1. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re HayesOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kovacic v. Cuyahoga County Dep't of Children & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. In re K.H.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008

343 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API