Legal Opinion
In re Jeisean M.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 2004No. SC 17012PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The respondent mother1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights with respect to her son, Jeisean M.2 She contends that in light of this court’s decision in Roth v. Weston, 259 Conn. 202, 789 A.2d 431 (2002), General Statutes § 17a-112 (j)3 is facially unconstitutional or unconstitu*385tional as applied to the facts of the present case under the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution and article first, § 8, of the constitution of Connecticut. She also contends that the trial court improperly found, in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In re Juvenile Appeal (83-CD)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- In Re Davonta V.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. LenarzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- In re Jermaine S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Verspyck v. FrancoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.