Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Sweeney

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 21, 2004No. SC 16978PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The defendant, Dennis R. Sweeney, appeals, following our grant of certification, 1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court dismissing his appeal, for lack of a final judgment, from the trial court’s pendente lite order granting the plaintiff, Dale M. Sweeney, permission to enroll the parties’ minor child in parochial school. Sweeney v. Sweeney, 75 Conn. App. 279, 289, 815 A.2d 287 (2003). The defendant claims that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that the trial court’s pendente lite order, which was entered in the course of dissolution proceedings and directed that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. In Re Melody L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Putman v. KennedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Commissioner of Transportation v. Rocky Mountain, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API