Legal Opinion

Schuster v. City Council

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 31, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Division No. 2).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson

Eeversing.

This is an agreed case instituted to test the validity of a proposed bond issue, by Oakdale, a city of the fifth class, in Jefferson county. Between January 1st and April 1st, 1918, the city council of Oakdale, by various ordinances, provided that certain streets of that city should be improved by grading, curbing, guttering, and otherwise, under section 3643 Kentucky Statutes, known as the ten-year bond plan, whereby the property of abutting owners is in lien to the city for the costs of the improvements.

*761At the time of the enacting of the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shaver v. Rice, MayorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Castle v. City of LouisaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Little v. Town of SouthgateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Little v. Town of SouthgateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API