Little v. Town of Southgate
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Drury, Commissioner
Affirming.
This is the second appeal of tbis case. For opinion upon the former appeal, see 221 Ky. 604, 299 S. W. 587. On the first appeal, Little and his wife attacked the valiity of the ordinance providing for sewering the town of Southgate for two reasons. First, because the entire town was made into one sewer district, and on the former appeal that question was decided in favor of the town. Their second attack was because the ordinance providing for the work made the bonds that might be issued to pay for it a debt of the town. They alleged that at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Inge v. Board of Public Works of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Anderson v. Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- State ex rel. Robert Mitchell Furniture Co. v. TooleMontana Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Electric Corporation v. FasiHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- Superior Incinerator Co. of Texas v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- O. J. Photo Supply, Inc. v. McNaryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hearne v. City of CatlettsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- C & D Contractors, Inc. v. Delaware Technical & Community CollegeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.