Legal Opinion

Nichols Ex Rel. Kauk v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1996No. 84130PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice.

The issues presented on certiorari are: (1) Are the plaintiffs within the class of claim ants who may maintain a common-law action to recover on a nuisance theory? (2) Was it an abuse of discretion for the trial court to admit evidence about the plaintiffs medical condition? (3) Was it reversible error to admit, during the punitive-damages stage of the trial, evidence of the financial condition of a defendant’s (Mid-Continent Pipeline Company’s [Mid-Continent]) parent corporation? (4) Was the trial court’s refusal to declare a mistrial for intemperate remarks by plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Lockhart v. LoosenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Capshaw v. Gulf Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. Grant v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Red Arrow Marina Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API