Legal Opinion
Grant v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 23, 2000No. 89,373PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
11 The petitioner, Dianne Grant, appealed an order of a Workers' Compensation Court three-judge panel, which had affirmed the finding of the trial court. Pursuant to 1992 Okla. Sess. Laws, ch. 294, § 10(B), now codified as 85 0.8.Supp.1999, § 41.1(B), the trial court found that the respondent-employer, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, was entitled to credit for overpayment of temporary disability compensation. The Court of Civil Appeals held that § 41.1(B) is an impermissible special law, which denies equal protection of the law to citizens of the state. The respondent-employer petitioned for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Daily Leader v. Cameron, AuditorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Holbert v. EcheverriaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Jacobs Ranch, L.L.C. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- EOG Resources Marketing, Inc. v. Oklahoma State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.