Lockhart v. Loosen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
¶ 1 Dispositive of Loosen’s appeal is whether there are factual issues which should have been resolved by the trier of fact before it dismissed her claim with prejudice. Application of traditional common-law principles of causation require that Lockhart’s claim be remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Lockhart alleges that Loosen — knowing she had genital herpes — engaged in sexual intercourse with David Lockhart [appellant’s husband]. She contends that Loosen not only failed to warn Lockhart’s husband of her contagion but…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Dubbs Ex Rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Wilson v. MuckalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Fanning v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.