United States of America, Libelant-Appellee v. Eugene Wagner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.
Wagner was charged by “libel of information” with importing certain orthopedic devices by means of false statements on invoices in violation of 19 U.S. C. §§ 1481, 1484, and 1485. The Government alleged that, as a result of these violations, the devices should be forfeited pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592. The district court granted the forfeiture. We affirm.
Wagner was a dealer in orthopedic devices. In the past, he had purchased certain “artificial knees” from a manufacturer in Soviet Occupied [East] Germany for importation into the United States. Wagner paid the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Audrey Bride, , United States of America v. Madeline DefalcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Jen Dao Chen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Fifty-Three (53) Eclectus Parrots, and George E. Allen, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. R. I. T. A. Organics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Von Neumann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.