Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrade
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 23, 1950No. 12119_1PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, District Judge.
The United States has appealed to this court from an order of the district court denying forfeiture to the government of one 1947 Cadillac sedanette automobile and directing instead that such vehicle should be turned over to the intervener, Jack Andrade, the appellee herein.
The government seized and sought forfeiture of said Cadillac automobile because of illegal transportation and sale of narcotics in same on several occasions.
The intervener is the vendor of said automobile under a conditional sales contract to one Everett Brown, vendee.
The district court held that said…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Platt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. ONE DODGE COUPE, ETC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- United States v. HeckingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- United States v. One 1941 Plymouth Tudor Sedan, Motor No. P11-214976Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Robert J. L'hoste, R. J. L'Hoste & Company, Inc., Clarence Eugene Rogers and Marvin Cochran, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. MageeanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986
- Yale Simons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Associates Investment Company, Intervenor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. One 1949 Pontiac SedanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.