Legal Opinion
United States v. Audrey Bride, , United States of America v. Madeline Defalco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 1962No. 17710_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGE, District Judge.
In both cases the United States appeals from judgments entered by the District Court denying forfeiture of two automobiles, following trials on merits, on libels of information filed by the Government, claiming that the automobiles were used in bookmaking activities, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 4411 and 4412, and are forfeit to the United States under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 7302. 1
In both cases the principal point relied upon by the appellant is that the trial court erred in holding that the automobiles were not subject to forfeiture…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Lane Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. One 1957 Oldsmobile Automobile, Motor No. A227445, and General Motors Acceptance Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Fifty-Three (53) Eclectus Parrots, and George E. Allen, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Isadore Blau v. Max Factor & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. One 1965 Buick, Etc., Wilbur Dean and Delores Dean, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Yale Simons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.