Legal Opinion

Jen Dao Chen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 13, 1967No. 20210PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

This was a proceeding brought by the United States in the court below for the purpose of procuring a forfeiture of certain objects alleged to have been imported into the United States by means of a false declaration in violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1592. Forfeiture is also claimed on the ground that the objects, hereinafter described, were brought into the United States without procuring an import license as required by a Treasury regulation (CFR Title 31, § 500.204), promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury and which related to the importing or otherwise dealing in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. 1,150½ Pounds of CelluloidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  2. United States v. One Silk RugCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
  3. United States v. Seventy-Five Bales of TobaccoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Fifty-Three (53) Eclectus Parrots, and George E. Allen, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. One 1967 Cadillac Coupe Eldorado, Motor No. H7185812, License No. Tvg 691, Its Tools and AppurtenancesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States of America, Libelant-Appellee v. Eugene WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API