Jen Dao Chen v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
This was a proceeding brought by the United States in the court below for the purpose of procuring a forfeiture of certain objects alleged to have been imported into the United States by means of a false declaration in violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1592. Forfeiture is also claimed on the ground that the objects, hereinafter described, were brought into the United States without procuring an import license as required by a Treasury regulation (CFR Title 31, § 500.204), promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury and which related to the importing or otherwise dealing in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. 1,150½ Pounds of CelluloidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- United States v. One Silk RugCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
- United States v. Seventy-Five Bales of TobaccoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Fifty-Three (53) Eclectus Parrots, and George E. Allen, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. One 1967 Cadillac Coupe Eldorado, Motor No. H7185812, License No. Tvg 691, Its Tools and AppurtenancesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States of America, Libelant-Appellee v. Eugene WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.