Legal Opinion
Hoe v. Scott
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided March 19, 1898PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
Upon a final hearing in this cause the defendant was adjudged to have infringed the complainants’ patent, and an interlocutory decree was entered referring it to a master to ascertain and take and settle the account of the gains and profits, and to assess the damages, and to report thereon. See 65 Fed. 606, and 17 C. C. A. 410, 70 Fed. 781. The complainants are undertaking to prove the number of infringing machines made and sold by the defendant, and the amount of profits realized by defendant by the use of infringing devices. In the progress of the investigation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1893
- Wooster v. ThorntonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886
- Hoe v. ScottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1895
- Scott v. HoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1895
- Union Sugar Refinery v. MathiessonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1868
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunkley Co. v. Central California CanneriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Chicago Grain Door Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1905
- Pathe Laboratories, Inc. v. Du Pont Film Mfg. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Miami Copper Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1920
- Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.