Chicago Grain Door Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
In Equity. On demurrer to supplemental bill.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
Demurrer to supplemental bill. The original bill was filed May 24, 1902, alleging infringement of patent No. 527,792, issued to E. A. Hill October 23, 1894, for a car-door bracket, and praying for discovery, accounting, payment of profits, and injunction. Proofs were closed in July, 1904. On November 5, 1904, by leave of court and consent of parties, a supplemental bill was filed, alleging infringement by a separate device, begun at some time after the original bill was filed, and that complainant did not know of the use or threatened use of such independent device…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. MolitorSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Kennedy v. Georgia State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Cawood PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Berssenbrugge v. Luce Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939
- Dunkley Co. v. Central California CanneriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Rowe v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Plymouth Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- Rowe v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.