Legal Opinion

Wooster v. Thornton

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided January 26, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWiieeler, J.

This suit is brought upon reissued letters patent No. 5,180, dated December 10, 1870, and granted to the orator as assignee of Alexander Douglass, for an improved folding guide for turning in the edges of cloth or other material, preparatory to sowing, for binding and other purposes. The defendant offered no evidence and did not appear at the hearing; the patent had been several times adjudged to be valid; the evidence of the orator showed infringement by the defendant; and a decree was entered adjudging that the patent was valid, that the defendant had infringed, and that an account be taken…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Birdsall v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. The Suffolk Company v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Packet Co. v. SicklesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Frumentum Co. v. LauhoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  2. Dunkley Co. v. Central California CanneriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. O'Cedar Corporation v. FW Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  4. Hoe v. ScottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1898
  5. Brown Bag-Filling Mach. Co. v. DrohenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API