Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Miami Copper Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
In Equity. Suit by the Minerals Separation, Limited, against the Miami Copper Company. On motion for leave to file a supplemental bill.
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
This suit is based upon United States letters patent No. 835,120, No. 962,678, and No. 1,099,699. The bill of complaint of Minerals Separation, Limited, alleged infringement thereof by the defendant Miami Copper Company and prayed an injunction and an accounting. All the claims in issue, other than claim 9 of No. 835,120, which was adjudged to be too broad, were held valid and infringed. 237 Fed. 609; 244 Fed. 752, 157 C. C. A. 200. Thereupon the cause was referred to a master to take and state an account of the profits and to assess the damages. This is now being done.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rubber Co. v. GoodyearSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Miami Copper Co. v. Minerals Separation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Untermeyer v. FreundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
- Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
- Hoe v. ScottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Southern Pac. Co. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Miami Copper Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1921
- Wolf Mineral Process Corp. v. Mineral Separation North American Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1925
- Minerals Separation v. Miami Copper Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1920