Legal Opinion

Edison Electric Light Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manuf'g Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1893No. 6PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Suit by tbe Edison Electric Light Company and others against the Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company and others. On motion to discharge defendants’ rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

AOHESON, Circuit Judge.

The preliminary injunction issued in this case on December 27,- 1892, restrains the defendants, pendente lite, from infringing the second claim of the letters patent in suit, No. 223,898, granted to Thomas A. Edison January 27,1880, and particularly from making, using, or selling incandescent electric lamps of the kind described in the plaintiff’s moving papers, designated “Exhibits Nos. 1, 2, and 3,” and shown to be the same as lamps which had been adjudged to infringe the second claim of said patent, and the manufacture and sale of which were enjoined by the United…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Edison Electric Light Co. v. United States Electric Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoe v. ScottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1898
  2. Brown Bag-Filling Mach. Co. v. DrohenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1909
  3. Duff Manuf'g Co. v. ForgieU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Miami Copper Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1920
  5. Thomas v. Electric Porcelain Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API