Legal Opinion

Hart v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 2009No. 06F014086, A133287PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

This appeal concerns plaintiff landlord’s forcible entry and wrongful detainer (FED) action to recover possession of the premises that he rented to defendant. The trial court entered a general judgment by default against defendant for failure to file a timely answer, followed by an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside that judgment. Defendant appeals the judgment, ORS 19.245(2)(b) (allowing a defendant to appeal a judgment by default if the trial court has denied a motion to set aside the judgment), and the order, ORS 19.205(3) (allowing appeals from orders that affect a substantial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrow County School District 1 v. Oregon Land & Water Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Reeder v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. SAIF Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Ramsum v. WoldridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Bates v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pine Ridge Park v. FugereCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Balboa Apartments v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Wong v. GittingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API