Kessler v. Valerio
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The only assignment of error that presents any substantial question in this case is whether the court erred in charging the jury that the burden of proof was upon the defendant to prove that the note was an accommodation note and hence without consideration.
Sections 24 and 28 of the Negotiable Instruments Law (General Statutes, §§ 4382, 4386) provide as follows: Section 24: “Every negotiable instrument is deemed prima facie to have been issued for a valuable consideration, and every person whose signature appears thereon, to have become a party thereto for value.” Section 28: “Absence or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- First National Bank v. PaffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Harponola Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Carter v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- First Presbyterian Church v. DennisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Piner v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leonard v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Taylor v. Hamden Hall School, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Molk v. MicklewrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Fisher v. LehrerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Donnelly v. GarvanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.