Piner v. . Brittain
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Rountree, J., at October Term, 1913, of New HaNover.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
The court charged the jury, among other things, as follows: “This is a suit upon a promissory note between the payee and the maker, but the burden of proof of the issue is upon the plaintiff to show the execution of the note, and that it has not been paid. The defendant, the maker, contends that it was given without consideration, for the accommodation of the plaintiff. Upon proof of the note, placing it in evidence, showing, demand for payment, and that it has not been paid, the plaintiff makes out a prima facie case in his favor, and shifts the burden of proof to the defendant. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carnwright v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- County of Montgomery v. AuchleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Andrews v. Hayden's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
- Flint v. PhippsOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Tolbert v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Howard National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Leonard v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Hunt v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Shaffer v. BondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Stein v. . LevinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.