Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Paff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1913No. Appeal, No. 259PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Appeal, No. 259, Jan. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Northampton Co., Feb. T., 1911, No. 52, on verdict for defendant in case of First National Bank of Bangor v. Alfred M. Paff. Assumpsit upon a promissory note. Before Stewart, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. The note in suit was as follows: No. 86892 No.........

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 259, Jan. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Northampton Co., Feb. T., 1911, No. 52, on verdict for defendant in case of First National Bank of Bangor v. Alfred M. Paff. Assumpsit upon a promissory note. Before Stewart, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. The note in suit was as follows: No. 86892 No......... Bangor, Pa., Feb. 2, 1910. Due May 2. . Three months after date I promise to pay to the order of A. M. Paff $2,000 At First National Bank of Bangor, Pa. Two Thousand..............................Dollars Without defalcation value received with…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

But little need be said in affirming this judgment. Whether the appellee was liable on the note which he gave to the appellant and upon which this action was brought, depended upon a single and very simple disputed fact. The defense was want of consideration, and upon that theory the case was tried. This was the issue raised by the pleadings, for, in his affidavit of defense, or *517answer, as it is styled, the appellee’s distinct averment was that his defense was want of consideration; and to this the appellant filed its replication. The defense made at the trial was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Melon StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. O'Donnell v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Paul v. CarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  4. Wagner v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Carroll v. AsburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Rahn v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Cohen v. Simpson Real Estate Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Gailey v. Wilkinsburg Real Estate Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Stoever v. GowenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Hedrick v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API