Legal Opinion

Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. Allen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1888No. 13,097PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellee seeks to recover damages from the appellant for entering upon land and using it as a track for its railroad. The facts stated in the third paragraph of the appellant’s answer are, in substance, these: In 1870, the Indianapolis, Crawfordsville and Dan-ville Railroad Company took and appropriated the strip of land in dispute and constructed a railroad thereon. The entry and appropriation were by the license of Maria Brittingham, who was then the owner of the land, and is the appellee’s grantor. The appellant succeeded to all the rights of *309the Indianapolis,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. TuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Sherlock v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API