Legal Opinion

Sherlock v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1888No. 13,497PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From tbe Martin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

A demurrer was sustained to tbe second and sixth paragraphs of appellant’s complaint. That ruling is assigned as one of the errors for which the judgment should be reversed.

The substance of the second paragraph is, that appellant has owned a described tract of land for thirty years; that, in 1853, the New Albany and Salem Eailroad Company, •duly incorporated under the laws of this State, without having had damages assessed or tendered to appellant or his predecessor in the ownership of the land, and without his consent, or the consent of such predecessor, entered upon the land and constructed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Veeder v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. City of Logansport v. UhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. TuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Heckaman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Parker v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Kincaid v. Indianapolis Natural Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Hamlet Hay Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API