Robertson v. Van Cleave
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, J. —
The appellants allege in their complaint that they are the owners of an undivided interest in the land in controversy, and entitled to partition.
James McCabe, one of the appellees, alleges in his counterclaim these facts: The only interest or title of the plaintiffs is founded on a deed executed to them by the sheriff, and *219based on a sale made on the 24th day of January, 1884, The sale rests upon a judgment which became a lien on the 9th day of January, 1877, on the land in controversy, which was then owned by Matthias Van Cleave. The property was purchased by the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Coal Co. v. BlatchfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Kerrison v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Wakeman v. GroverNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
- Corcoran v. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. CushmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Needham v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Currier v. ElliotIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Jarrell v. BrubakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Dowell v. Talbot Paving Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.