Legal Opinion

State v. Webster

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2013No. 20130021PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Nick Webster appeals from a criminal judgment entered after he conditionally pled guilty to burglary, gross sexual imposition, and interfering with a telephone during an emergency call. Because we conclude the district court erred in determining Webster received sufficient Miranda warnings and waived his Miranda rights, we reverse the judgment and remand to allow Webster to withdraw his conditional guilty plea.

I

[¶ 2] In March 2012, the State charged Webster with burglary, gross sexual imposition, and interfering with a telephone during an emergency call after law…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RaiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. HansfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. KukertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. RogersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. Brickle-HicksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API