State v. Brickle-Hicks

McEvers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Morris Brickle-Hicks appeals from a criminal judgment entered after the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence and a jury found him guilty of murder. Brickle-Hicks argues the court erred in denying his motion to suppress incriminating statements made by him to law enforcement officers and physical evidence he provided to the officers. We conclude *783 the court's denial of Brickle-Hicks' motion to suppress is supported by sufficient competent evidence and is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] According to Bismarck police…