Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Rice

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Newton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— In this action, the appellee, as plaintiff, sued the appellant, as defendant, in the court below, to recover -damages for an alleged malicious prosecution.

In his complaint, the appellee alleged, in substance, that, on the 1st day of August, 1875, the appellant did, at Newton county, Indiana, falsely and maliciously, and without any reasonable or probable cause whatever, ■charge the appellee, before one David M. Pulver, a justice of the peace of said county, with having committed :a certain offence against the laws of this State, known as .■grand larceny, to wit: he then and there charged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stancliff v. PalmeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Scotten v. LongfellowIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Lacy v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Emmons v. MeekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Spath v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Becknell v. BecknellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Helwig v. BecknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ades v. LeviIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. West v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API