Legal Opinion
Stancliff v. Palmeter
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 24 opinions
APPEAL from the Noble Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Action for a malicious prosecution. Demurrer to the complaint sustained; .final judgment for the defendant.
The complaint is as follows:
William D. Stanolief, v. Judson Palmeter.
In the Noble Circuit Court, October term, 1859.
The plaintiff says:
“The defendant, on the 23d day of February,at the *322county of Noble, State of Indiana, falsely and maliciously, and without any reasonable or probable cause whatever, charged the plaintiff before Reginald H. Hall, a United States Commissioner for the District of Indiana, with having committed a certain offence against the laws of the United States relating…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morris v. ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- M'Neely v. DriskillIndiana Supreme Court · 1829
- Bacon v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
- Collins v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
- Usher v. WhitingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1823
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Pennsylvania Co. v. WeddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Shaul v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- Fisher v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Colter v. LowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.