Legal Opinion

Stancliff v. Palmeter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Action for a malicious prosecution. Demurrer to the complaint sustained; .final judgment for the defendant.

The complaint is as follows:

William D. Stanolief, v. Judson Palmeter.

In the Noble Circuit Court, October term, 1859.

The plaintiff says:

“The defendant, on the 23d day of February,at the *322county of Noble, State of Indiana, falsely and maliciously, and without any reasonable or probable cause whatever, charged the plaintiff before Reginald H. Hall, a United States Commissioner for the District of Indiana, with having committed a certain offence against the laws of the United States relating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. M'Neely v. DriskillIndiana Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Bacon v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  4. Collins v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  5. Usher v. WhitingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. WeddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Shaul v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  4. Fisher v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Colter v. LowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API