Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Holliday
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Le Elo.re County; Malcolm E. Rosser, Judge. Action by James E. Holliday against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company for damages from an unreasonable search, instituted maliciously and without probable cause by the defendant. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
This case presents error from the district court of Le Flore county. On February 22, 1909, the defendant in error, James E. Holliday, who was plaintiff below, and who will hereafter be designated as plaintiff, commenced an action in the district court, of Le Flore county against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, defendant, and hereinafter designated as such. The petition, omitting the caption, is in words and figures as follows:
“Comes now James E. Holliday, the plaintiff herein, and for cause of action against defendant, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. WeddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Carter v. Howe Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- American Express Co. v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Dennis v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Markley v. SnowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gowin v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RadfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Leong Yau v. CardenHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
- Sawyer v. ShickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. WainscottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.