Legal Opinion

Helwig v. Beckner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1897No. 17,943PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee brought this action against appellant to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The jury returned a special verdict, on which appellant moved for a judgment in his favor, which motion the court overruled and rendered judgment thereon in favor of appellee. The errors assigned call in question the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a judgment in his favor, and in rendering judgment in favor of appellee.

It is insisted by appellant that the special verdict is not sufficient to support a judgment in favor of appellee, for the reason that the jury failed to make…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. WeddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Oliver v. PateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  5. Griffin v. ChubbTexas Supreme Court · 1852

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Martin v. CorscaddenMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Sarwark Motor Sales, Inc. v. WoolridgeArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. HelmickIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Tucker v. HyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API