Legal Opinion

People v. Girotti

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1924No. Crim. No. 777PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

By separate counts in the information the defendant was charged with two unlawful sales of intoxicating liquor, one alleged to have been made on the 18th and the other on the 22d of October, 1923. He was convicted of both offenses and prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

L. R. King, a private detective employed by the district attorney, testified that he purchased whisky from defendant as charged in both counts; that on the 22d he arrived at defendant’s store at Merced Falls about 5 or 5:30 o’clock in the evening, not later than 5:30'; that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Lee GamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. LevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People v. LattimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. CostelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. HammerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. ThorpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API