Legal Opinion

People v. Hammer

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1925No. Docket No. 1214PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

Defendant was charged with having committed rape upon the person of a girl under the age of eighteen years, the alleged victim having been of the age of sixteen at the time of the alleged offense. The jury rendered a verdict of guilty and defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and from an order of the trial court denying his motion for a new trial.

The testimony of appellant, and of three other witnesses who corroborated him, established a perfect alibi, if the jury had elected to believe the evidence put forward by the defense upon that issue. The trial judge instructed the jury:

“Th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. People v. LattimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. People v. GirottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. People v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CostelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. SpillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. People v. PiersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. People v. LinehanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. People v. ReeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API