People v. Hammer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
Defendant was charged with having committed rape upon the person of a girl under the age of eighteen years, the alleged victim having been of the age of sixteen at the time of the alleged offense. The jury rendered a verdict of guilty and defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and from an order of the trial court denying his motion for a new trial.
The testimony of appellant, and of three other witnesses who corroborated him, established a perfect alibi, if the jury had elected to believe the evidence put forward by the defense upon that issue. The trial judge instructed the jury:
“Th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. LattimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. GirottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. CostelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. SpillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. PiersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. LinehanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People v. ReeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944