Legal Opinion

Cashman Ex Rel. Cashman v. Cherry

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 2000No. 82,977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This is an underinsured motorist (UIM) case arising from a settlement by three injured persons, all members of the same family. Mandi Cashman, a minor, through Arnold D. Cashman, her father and next friend, claims she is entitled to UIM coverage from American Family Mutual Insurance Co. (American Family), Intervenor. The district court and the Court of Appeals disagreed. We granted Mandi’s petition for review to resolve a perceived conflict between two Court of Appeals opinions, Jones v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, 26 Kan. App. 2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Jarboe v. Board of Sedgwick County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  4. Allied Mutual Insurance v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Jones v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. O'Donoghue v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Long Ex Rel. Estate of Rhoten v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Halsey v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Narron v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. O'Donoghue v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API