Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Cummings

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 28, 1989No. 63,062PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.:

This appeal is from a decision holding that appellants Lisa Vest, Angie Vest, and Vivian Vest Pinnell were not entitled to uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage under their insurance policy.

The decision by the trial court is based on facts stipulated to by the parties. The facts are not particularly complicated and indicate that on February 4, 1985, a collision occurred between a vehicle owned by Vivian Vest Pinnell and driven by Charles Pinnell, in which Lisa Vest, Angie Vest, and Bradley Vest were occupants, and a vehicle driven by Carlene Purcell and owned by James…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. NoelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Haas v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. ChastainDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Marquis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Crist v. Hunan Palace, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Grimmett v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. Chance v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  5. Farmers Insurance v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API