Legal Opinion
Halsey v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 24, 2003No. 87,263PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of die court was delivered by
Davis, J.:
Three passengers died and four other passengers were injured in a Chevrolet Suburban when it collided widi a tractor-trailer. After recovery from the tortfeasor, the husband of a deceased passenger brought suit against his insurance carrier, Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co., Inc. (Farm Bureau), to recover the difference between his recovery from the tortfeasor and his actual damages in underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. Farm Bureau denied coverage because his UIM policy limits of $500,000 was less than die tortfeasors limits of liability…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Liggatt v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Claro Gonzales and Tomasa R. Gonzales, by Personal Representative v. Millers Casualty Insurance Company of Texas, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Reynolds-Rexwinkle Oil, Inc. v. Petex, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MessingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- O'Donoghue v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Long Ex Rel. Estate of Rhoten v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Loucks v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
- Hemenway v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.