Legal Opinion
In re A Motion for a Standing Order
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided July 2, 1990No. 90-85PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY OF DECISION
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
This is a rule-making matter, undertaken at the behest of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary), pursuant to the Court’s authority to adopt rules of practice and procedure under 38 U.S.C.A. § 4064(a) (West Supp.1990). The Secretary requests that the Court adopt a rule by a standing order excepting him from the proscriptions of two privacy laws. Those laws prohibit him from filing with the Court relevant records from a veteran’s case file, thus frustrating the right of appeal conferred by the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act, Pub.L. No. 100-687,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Erspamer v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Heights Community Congress v. Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Faust v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
- In Re TuckerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re John Joseph MackCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Mack v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992