Legal Opinion
In Re Tucker
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 27, 1997No. 94-BG-1280PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
This- matter is before the court on the motion of the Office of Bar Counsel for an order directing the Federal Bureau of Inves tigation (FBI) to produce materials relevant to a disciplinary proceeding and to make an FBI agent available to provide related testimony. On July 14, 1995, we granted Bar Counsel’s motion as unopposed. The matter was subsequently reopened 1 and the parties have filed legal memoranda with respect to the question whether this court has authority to enter the requested order. We conclude that we have the requisite authority and reaffirm our…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Dynavac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- John Doe v. Joseph DigenovaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Marvin Echols v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re TuckerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Antwan Buchanan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Antwan Buchanan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.