Legal Opinion
Gamble v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 1941No. Civ. 6446PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
Petitioner at all of the times herein referred to was a member of the Police Department of the City of Sacramento and in receipt of a salary fixed by an initiative ordinance adopted by the people of that city.
In January, 1932, the City of Sacramento found it necessary, due to the financial and business depression, to drastically cut its expenses, and was faced with the problem of either reducing the personnel of the Police Department or obtaining contributions from the salaries of all its members. This matter was submitted to the members of that department, and it was unanimously agreed in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People Ex Rel. Satterlee v. . Board of PoliceNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Be Boest v. GambellOregon Supreme Court · 1899
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Ukiah v. FonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- National Automobile Insurance v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Eaton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Glaser v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- O'Sullivan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.