Legal Opinion

O'Sullivan v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1956No. Civ. 17131PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin defendant city, its mayor and the members of its civil service commission from “permitting, requiring or allowing” employees of the city’s street repair and street cleaning departments to sign waivers of premium pay for work done before 8 o’clock a. m. After trial, judgment was entered in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.

Section 151.3 of the charter of the city and county of San Francisco provides that when “any groups or crafts” establish a rate of pay in private employment through collective bargaining agreements with employers, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glavey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Nutter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. Pacific Grape Products Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Coyne v. RennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lucchesi v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1992
  3. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1987
  4. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1988
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API