Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Clark

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1901No. 12,681; No. 12,690PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J. :

By these proceedings two candidates for office seek to compel the acceptance and filing of their nomination papers. Albert H. Wilson was nominated by the political party to which he belongs as judge of the district court of the thirty-third judicial district; but when he presented his certificate of nomination to the secretary of state for acceptance and filing it was refused, not because of defects in form or matter, but on the theory that no election for that office is to be held this year.

E. H. He wins, who was nominated by petition…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. RansonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. State ex rel. Harrison v. MenaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Comm'rs of Ottawa Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. State ex rel. Goodin v. ThomanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. Woodruff v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Sedlak v. DickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Godard v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. City of Wichita v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API