Legal Opinion
Sedlak v. Dick
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 13, 1995No. 70,792PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Allegrucci, J.:
In this original action, petitioners Michael Sedlak, Richard D. Woodworth, and John Ratliff challenge the constitutionality of two provisions of the Workers Compensation Act as revised in 1993, K.S.A. 44-555b and K.S.A. 44-556. These sections establish the Workers Compensation Board (Board), provide for Board members to be selected by one representative of the Kansas Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) and one representative of the Kansas AFL-CIO, and subject Board actions to review by the Court of Appeals on questions of law only.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. FadelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- People ex rel. Grinnell v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. LewellenTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. UNIFIED GOV. OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITYSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- In re the Care & Treatment of HendricksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.