Legal Opinion
Moncrief v. Hobby
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 29, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 7905PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this case, the widow of James Gilbert Moncrief, filed a claim with the Federal Security Administration for herself and as mother and guardian of Patricia Y. Moncrief, a minor, for social security benefits. After extended consideration of the claim at various administrative levels, it was finally denied by the Department on the ground that it was not authorized by the applicable statute, 42 U.S.C.A. § 417(e). The complaint in this case was filed to reverse this administrative determination. The authority and jurisdiction for consideration of the case is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Stewart v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Piedmont & Northern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Associated Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Moncrief v. FolsomCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Moncrief v. FolsomCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Opal L. Taylor and Mary A. Taylor v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Opal L. Taylor and Mary A. Taylor v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968