Legal Opinion · Dissent

Opal L. Taylor and Mary A. Taylor v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1968No. 18822Published

1Dissent

VAN OOSTERHOÜT,

Chief Judge (dissenting).

I would affirm the judgment of dismissal upon the basis of the well-considered opinion of Chief Judge Harris reported at D.C., 264 F.Supp. 610. Social Security benefits are created by and dependent upon federal statutes. Coverage must have a statutory basis. It is undisputed that the appellant-claimants must rely upon a portion of Mr. Taylor’s period of naval service to establish coverage. Mr. Taylor’s twenty years of active naval service ending on May 7, 1948, qualifies him as a World War II and a post-World War II veteran within the meaning of 42…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moncrief v. FolsomCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  2. Moncrief v. HobbyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  3. Taylor v. GardnerDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1967
  4. Sutherland v. FlemmingDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API