Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Smith
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
The question is whether assumption of risk is a defense in a suit brought by a seaman under the Jones Act to recover for injuries resulting from his use, while on duty, of a defective appliance of the ship, when he chose to use the unsafe appliance instead of a safe method of doing his work, which was known to him.
Respondent, a seaman, brought the present suit in the District Court for southern New York to recover, under the Jones Act, 41 Stat. 1007, 46 U. S. C. § 688, for an injury received from a fall in the engine room of petitioner’s vessel. The fall was caused by a defective step on…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Jamison v. EncarnacionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by351 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
346 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.