Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte Bros.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
The Federal Trade Commission found that IBunte Brothers, candy manufacturers in Illinois, sold products there in what the trade calls “break and take” packages, *350which makes the amount the purchaser receives dependent upon chance; and that thereby it was enabled in the Illinois market to compete unfairly with manufacturers outside of Illinois who could not indulge in this device because the Trade Commission has barred “break and take” packages as an “unfair method of competition.” Federal Trade Commission Act, § 5 (a), 38 Stat. 719, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 45, Federal Trade Comm’n v. Keppel…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. OlsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by254 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.