Legal Opinion
James William Pope v. Mississippi Real Estate Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1989No. 88-4301PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
James and Mary Pope sued several private and governmental entities claiming that the defendants had excluded them from the real estate market in Monroe County, Mississippi. They raised federal claims under the antitrust statutes and the Constitution and several state law claims. The district court, finding that the Popes had failed to establish the factual prerequisites of their federal claims, granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and dismissed the Popes’ claims with prejudice. The Popes appeal. We affirm.
I. Factual Background
James and Mary Pope operate a real estate agency in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Posadas De Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Co. of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Susan and Reggie Griffith v. Marlin Johnston, Individually and as Commissioner of the Texas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Nolan Longmire v. William Guste, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Richard L. Britt and Timothy Jackson, Jr. v. The Grocers Supply Company, Inc., James E. Hamilton v. The Grocers Supply Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Joseph v. Morales v. Pan American Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Flash Memory Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.