Legal Opinion

Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 24, 1988No. 86-1845PublishedCited by 1,094 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

This case presents the question whether a federal appellate court has jurisdiction over a party who was not specified in the notice of appeal in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c).

I

Petitioner Jose Torres is one of 16 plaintiffs who intervened in an employment discrimination suit against respondent Oakland Scavenger Co. (hereafter respondent) after receiving notice of the action pursuant to a settlement agreement between respondent and the original plaintiffs. In their complaint, the intervenors purported to proceed not only on their own behalf, but also on behalf of all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Bonilla v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,094 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Samuel Jackson v. Joseph LightseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. Theodore L. Leblanc v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Madewell v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

1,089 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API