Legal Opinion
People v. Albert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct on cross-examination of defendant and on summation. We disagree. The court sustained defense counsel’s objections to the cited instances of prosecutorial misconduct on cross-examination of defendant, and defense counsel neither moved for a mistrial nor sought curative instructions, thereby failing to preserve any error for our review (see, People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951; People v Bruce, 216 AD2d 913). Defense counsel failed to object to the alleged instances of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MedinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. SatloffNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. NimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. BruceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. TolbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. McCoveryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. BurnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.