Legal Opinion

People v. Satloff

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1982PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that the jury’s verdicts on two counts of the indictment are inconsistent is not preserved for our review. Following discharge of the jury, defense counsel complained, for the first time, of the asserted inconsistency. At this point, it was no longer possible to remedy the defect, if any, by resubmission to the jury for reconsideration of its verdicts {People v Stahl, 53 NY2d 1048, 1050). Such a protest must be registered prior to the discharge of the jury properly to preserve the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. StahlNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. People v. AlfaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. ThorpeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Schabe v. Hampton Bays Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People v. LandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API